Section 5 of the review
Reproducibility dashboard
Interactive summaries of code availability, practical rerunnability, and FAIR4RS compliance for the 60 reviewed methods (aligned with Figure 3 in the companion paper). Charts and the table below share the same filters; criteria are defined in the scoring rubric.
Audit summaries
Charts reflect the current filters.
Code availability & reruns
Stacked counts by group: public and runnable (4/4), public but partial, or no code / offline at audit.
FAIR4RS distribution
Among methods with accessible code only. Vertical tick marks the ≥ 3/5 threshold (companion paper Figure 3B).
60 methods
| Method | Publication Year | Class | Setting | Reproducibility Score | FAIR4RS SCORE | Software | Audited |
|---|
No methods match the current filters. Try clearing filters or broadening your search.
Scoring rubric
Each method is scored on two complementary axes whose sub-criteria are applied uniformly across the 60 reviewed methods. Per-method audit data lives on each method page.
Reproducibility (0-4)
Reproducibility score (0 to 4): one point each for public tool, README with instructions, bundled example data, and step-by-step tutorial. N/A when no accessible code or web tool at audit. A score of 4/4 is treated as independently runnable.
FAIR4RS (0-5)
FAIR4RS score (0 to 5): OSI-approved license, versioned releases, archival DOI, environment specification, and citation metadata. N/A when no accessible code or web tool at audit. A score of at least 3 of 5 is treated as crossing the FAIR4RS threshold.
Archival materials
The frozen audit matrix for the 60 reviewed methods is in the SI_3 table. Rerunnable scripts and archived outputs are deposited at acceptance.
The manuscript PDF, DOI, and supplementary tables will be linked here when they are available.